From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  8 22:40:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFC0106564A;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2012 22:40:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.214.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACF88FC16;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2012 22:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so2352336obb.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=SA8jYT5RjN+GL32oLqZTmNYucduDo7Fve58QLG6VIiI=;
	b=i31yHpuc98DkN9g0hSsAIF+L83/78uzFcSIlt+fuIqIYLPjuFgHGJTTHsIQByIj5vN
	bqKUiisKWss5Pl+xrXZ+NKjfL6zCNuUzqgkOSV1/WI0pcg5ZYsr7shGsA4wE3OFKBxFB
	7v7kpiVrTd3jIX8IM5SdUhWNT72VDaTUzX12GJF033cegFCfPNdnl84Exez+dGr3Tcs4
	tqi+vDWZn5cFJ7r4lRnZqm1++Ot2+e3H8qwd2Coi7N/Zgrwl+LJTidMONZ1t2AfVlJ2R
	PRQdfZhBpFy9IkGwQcI49UuK67Rz4DDwOlnfT/ws3VGROrJjRHO6Cd1RKFr0zAYzeeZP
	cYuw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.194 with SMTP id e2mr32841684oee.1.1344465656253; Wed, 08
	Aug 2012 15:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.84.7 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACS+7ZSu5FuBfXDvJXXYX+_ugmYGDfvut9PrdmRX4zkxLmxnvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACS+7ZSu5FuBfXDvJXXYX+_ugmYGDfvut9PrdmRX4zkxLmxnvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:40:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGH67wRYD=iKD1Qoz6AB+g17sQyrPe1Q010skLNTeuQHBz3_fQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To: Dan McGregor <danismostlikely@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Consistent use of lex flags
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 22:40:57 -0000

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Dan McGregor <danismostlikely@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was just noticing that mkcsmapper doesn't build with clang.  I saw two
> ways to do this, the first being to #define YY_NO_INPUT, and the other to
> use the %option noinput lex flag.
>
> While there, I decided to explore and I changed a bunch of #defines to the
> standard lex way of doing things.  I thought it would be good if all the
> code that originated in FreeBSD could be consistent.
>
> Thoughts?

    Probably should CC gabor@ next time (done this time) and maybe
involve the NetBSD folks as this code is sort of upstreamed from them
IIRC.
Cheers!
-Garrett