Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:40:56 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Dan McGregor <danismostlikely@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Consistent use of lex flags Message-ID: <CAGH67wRYD=iKD1Qoz6AB%2Bg17sQyrPe1Q010skLNTeuQHBz3_fQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACS%2B7ZSu5FuBfXDvJXXYX%2B_ugmYGDfvut9PrdmRX4zkxLmxnvg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACS%2B7ZSu5FuBfXDvJXXYX%2B_ugmYGDfvut9PrdmRX4zkxLmxnvg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Dan McGregor <danismostlikely@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was just noticing that mkcsmapper doesn't build with clang. I saw two
> ways to do this, the first being to #define YY_NO_INPUT, and the other to
> use the %option noinput lex flag.
>
> While there, I decided to explore and I changed a bunch of #defines to the
> standard lex way of doing things. I thought it would be good if all the
> code that originated in FreeBSD could be consistent.
>
> Thoughts?
Probably should CC gabor@ next time (done this time) and maybe
involve the NetBSD folks as this code is sort of upstreamed from them
IIRC.
Cheers!
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wRYD=iKD1Qoz6AB%2Bg17sQyrPe1Q010skLNTeuQHBz3_fQ>