From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 29 23:32:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA13375 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 23:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.risc.org (taob@trt-on16-20.netcom.ca [207.181.85.84]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA13354; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 23:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (taob@localhost) by alpha.risc.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA04100; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 02:32:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 02:32:03 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao To: David Langford cc: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS-L , FREEBSD-ISP-L Subject: Re: "interfaces" patch to BIND (was Re: problem with over 133 virutal domains with apache on 2.1.7) In-Reply-To: <199703300713.VAA01023@caliban.dihelix.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 29 Mar 1997, David Langford wrote: > > Any reasons that we cant add something like this to the default > named? I assume that if you dont have an "interface" line that it > acts nomrally. Right. There is also another patch that adds the "permnets" directive. It allows you to specify which physical interfaces will respond to DNS queries (like on a firewall). It complements the xfernets directive (which restricts zone transfers). http://www.ers.ibm.com/~davy/software/bind.html -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"