From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 14 07:10:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79CF5D0D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.citrix.com", Issuer "Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DBB3F77 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:10:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,574,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="254774384" Message-ID: <552CBD60.80802@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:10:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= CC: Subject: Re: Two issues with xen References: <5528F578.2030908@entel.upc.edu> <552BAE1C.1090603@citrix.com> <97e3bb8b2ea7acfb89c861e21f1534c7@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <552BE23D.9030107@citrix.com> <552BFBD3.7060304@citrix.com> <552CACE1.8070101@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <552CACE1.8070101@entel.upc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-DLP: MIA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:10:28 -0000 Hello, El 14/04/15 a les 8.00, Gustau PĂ©rez ha escrit: > this morning I was able to the patch, and apparently it fixes the > reboots with PV domU guests. Right now I'm installing debian as PV with > no problems. Thank you. > > As I'm using 4.5 from the ports tree on this laptop, I'd like to ask > the port's maintainer (bapt) to integrate this patch. Do you think it > would be safe to integrate the patch in the ports tree? Since the patch is for the FreeBSD kernel itself it's not possible to integrate it in the port. I have to rework it a little bit before committing, will probably send you a new version later so you can test the final version before I commit it, since I'm not able to reproduce this problem on my boxes. Roger.