Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 01:21:53 +0100 From: Willem van Engen <wvengen@stack.nl> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: ports/35656: misc/sword-modules patch: be more conservative about redistribution Message-ID: <20020308012153.0e214983.wvengen@stack.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 35656 >Category: ports >Synopsis: misc/sword-modules patch: be more conservative about redistribution >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 07 16:30:00 PST 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Willem van Engen >Release: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 >Organization: >Environment: >Description: When checking the modules' licenses, it seemed better to be a bit more conservative about redistribution. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- misc/sword-modules/Makefile.orig Thu Mar 7 13:55:35 2002 +++ misc/sword-modules/Makefile Thu Mar 7 13:56:09 2002 @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ NO_BUILD= yes USE_ZIP= yes +NO_CDROM= Not all modules may freely be distributed +NO_PACKAGE= Not all modules may freely be distributed + # Modules may change, but it has no effect on their functionality. I think # it's best not to use checksum. Besides, there is no version number on modules. NO_CHECKSUM= yes >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020308012153.0e214983.wvengen>