From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 19 8:56:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2E737B400 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id D8E509B13; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:56:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:56:25 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Bradley T Hughes Cc: Jeremy Norris , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: XFree86 4.2.0 going back in the tree Message-ID: <20020319165625.GA22998@squall.waterspout.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bradley T Hughes , Jeremy Norris , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20020315150609.GV53073@squall.waterspout.com> <200203191015.23087.bhughes@trolltech.com> <20020319121007.GA33325@babylon.merseine.nu> <200203191720.56565.bhughes@trolltech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200203191720.56565.bhughes@trolltech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:20:56PM +0100, Bradley T Hughes wrote: > Yes, I just upgraded to 4.2.0, and saw that everything was there. Don't > need any patches or work on it at all :) So do I misunderstand you, or can we remove the GL hack in the Qt2 port? Doing so would shrink its size somewhat. And is it that XFree86 itself needs no patch now? -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message