Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:07:32 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system Message-ID: <43CBEEF4.1000007@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local> References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org> <200601161324.57292.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <43CB8E90.8090902@suutari.iki.fi> <20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jos Backus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:16:16PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: > >>> On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:04, Colin Percival wrote: >>> >>>> About 12 hours ago I committed portsnap to HEAD. From the commit log: >>>> >>>> Add portsnap to the base system. This is a secure, easy to use, >>>> fast, lightweight, and generally good way for users to keep their >>>> ports trees up to date. >>>> >>>> >> Is there an utility (cvsup-replacement) like this for base system sources ? >> > > See csup: http://mu.org/~mux/csup.html. But it's not ready yet. Why would one want to replace cvsup? It works great!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43CBEEF4.1000007>