From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 21:30:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9419B37B401; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from InterJet.dellroad.org (adsl-63-194-81-26.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.81.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB35643F93; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@dellroad.org) Received: from arch20m.dellroad.org (arch20m.dellroad.org [10.2.2.20]) by InterJet.dellroad.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA92560; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:22:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arch20m.dellroad.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arch20m.dellroad.org (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h6O4M0Ko021747; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:22:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@arch20m.dellroad.org) Received: (from archie@localhost) by arch20m.dellroad.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6O4M07Y021746; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:22:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200307240422.h6O4M07Y021746@arch20m.dellroad.org> In-Reply-To: To: Julian Elischer Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:22:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: Brett Glass cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: Archie Cobbs cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NAT and PPTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 04:30:10 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd > > > > >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. > > > > > > > > I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) that Archie has been working > > > > with a company that does Wi-Fi access points with PPTP. If these use > > > > mpd, they must have a workaround for the limitation. So, the code may > > > > already exist. > > > > > > IIRC, Archive said that this was a complete (both "from scratch" > > > and proprietary) implementation of an MPD-like system. > > > > That's correct.. the code is not released. I'll ask about it again > > (but don't keep your hopes up). > > if that fails, how much would it take to allow mpd to use a pool of > addresses? It wouldn't be "too hard" but would require some major surgery to mpd... but it could use some :-) -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Halloo Communications * http://www.halloo.com