From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 04:24:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4AB16A46B for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1160D13C45B for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBH4OPGD018429; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:24:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4765FA09.8060508@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:24:41 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071213 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20071216.225955.111308887.hrs@allbsd.org> <20071216202200.51C4F5B2E@mail.bitblocks.com> <20071217.110245.36427121.hrs@allbsd.org> <20071217041040.GA32724@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20071217041040.GA32724@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dougb@freebsd.org, albert.shih@obspm.fr, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, bakul@bitblocks.com, nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net Subject: Re: TeTeX and TeXLive X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:24:53 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:02:45AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: >> Do you think splitting it to small packages will be a big problem? > > That many ports would create a significant impact on the build systems, > especially, sparc64, which is not keeping up at all as it is. > > mcl What does the build system do? Does it go to each port one at a time and do a "make package && pkg_delete -a" or similar? If so, this would mean that the, for example, xorg-library port would be remade many, many times. If this is the case, perhaps there is some way this process could be streamlined. But I can see the potential difficulties.