From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 17:14: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAE637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384E843E58 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:13:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6D0Dt4T094137 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:13:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:13:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: GCC/header-related regressions on -STABLE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020712201311.T39095-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > standards/40084 and standards/40402 constitute significant regressions > on -STABLE, which definitely should be fixed for 4.6.1-RELEASE. > > Having three-line C++ programs like the following > #include > #include > int main() { } > issue three(!) warnings with g++ -pedantic is A Very Bad Thing[TM], > especially on -STABLE. Should it not at least gripe that there's no return statement in a non-void function? -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message