From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 27 17:31:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA13236 for current-outgoing; Mon, 27 May 1996 17:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA13216 for ; Mon, 27 May 1996 17:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with ESMTP id BAA03711; Tue, 28 May 1996 01:29:24 +0100 (BST) To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , current@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: snmp for FreeBSD... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 May 1996 00:20:50 -0000." <2238.833242850@critter.tfs.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 01:29:23 +0100 Message-ID: <3709.833243363@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Poul-Henning Kamp wrote in message ID <2238.833242850@critter.tfs.com>: > > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote in message ID > > : > > > This past weekend, the University of California @ Davis put > > > out v3.1 of their snmp package. The "port" list included netbsd1, so > > > I figured that it couldn't be too hard to get it working under freebsd. > > I'm all for native SNMP support btw. So am I (which is why I asked for the pointers). I would make a lot of things easier. The real question is who's SNMP stuff do we go for... And also which one has (a) the best licensing and (b) is most extendable to meet our needs... Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info