From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 03:07:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0F016A420 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markzero@logik.ath.cx) Received: from addr9.addr.com (addr9.addr.com [209.249.147.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F0643D6A for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:07:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markzero@logik.ath.cx) Received: from logik.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by addr9.addr.com (8.12.11/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id j6M379nc099680; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by logik.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 13A6D6588; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:07:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:07:07 +0100 From: markzero To: ender Message-ID: <20050722030707.GA39218@logik.ath.cx> References: <42e0044a.3317306b.5585.30fe@mx.gmail.com> <42E058BC.9070004@tog.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E058BC.9070004@tog.net> X-GPG-Key: http://darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt X-Fingerprint: B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9DD1 X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (10%) X-ADDRSignature: 144B47DC Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: Adding OpenBSD sudo to the FreeBSD base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:07:21 -0000 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:23:56PM -0400, ender wrote: > Stephen Major wrote: >=20 > >You are correct; I made a mistake on that one. > >Sudo should not be forced upon anyone. > >I do not care if sudo is part of the base system > >I just 100% disagree with you wanting to replace su with sudo > > > >Look the other post that came from the dude before is 100% correct this = is=20 > >a > >dumb argument. > > > If sudo offered the opportunity for more features, but by default=20 > behaved exactly the same way as su, I would see no disadvantages to=20 > replacing su with sudo. Am i missing something? What happens if you maintain systems that don't need sudo? M --=20 pgp: http://www.darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9dD1 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQIVAwUBQuBi2qfaOQ/e/53RAQpaAhAAopaBmXx/U1xRb4igo6O1ERe6a6p8RXwX FUdlGdA5NJfX4oxja9Lnru8S5tNtRIhYb3mHWCwCvteKZHR1XeXiWaXoz+IOQ/jM Nvc89IEq2iXxXXVX/1R+OJdIPJ4BGeTM8iEUly5btX7RWgRjdO4FfVIcYcq+hRl/ AhKAamd+VhTbw2udbxL5yQqzjHc1a300Fsvv2+e2mM+Mywy5OXjIYqJodO1C0Y7N ALVO0WCFKrcy7vo/mVQj0/q1sJBQEm9Qu9QXwB4PKGFJGt/6+IboIfyNHitkIDCj N0v+XWMSFnqOievdnHBVmwByW/RIwMx3a5kt6gf1TSYCWv6TT9R2mPupUmrJvC10 ZkLTFGir6o0WpXKifnyLnOsepyQuOWG1Y/AAyeiTZ+1930j/Jtks4axzfkV69f/n tIC/2ekJCPq1bS07OKNm6w5gnqm3D9bdN2BC75aZrF9RUf+oebdiOB7e2SdZ4kCu pNv8FB5idgLP2AY0jupURjI1sYNT68h+tKIfwRx8G9vHE+QI7/oAejFdkALjHQAX G4QYFS2Q1JgFZ3zbvnWK194WDLwzkT/UwU55c+twYda1qmIG0r5TmVgqOlC1NnfD ViAnjrbP+9y6ySRLreg2CqSODj9BMffQDICicERLyHMeADYnPcHcwglSXD8+pv/A 2FEN/RMO52c= =iWxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--