From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 09:24:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA53616A417 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7535C13C4B6 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from d054074.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.54.74] (helo=janh.freebsd) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1IO8vw0EII-0004Jd; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:24:56 +0200 Message-ID: <46CD5268.3010704@janh.de> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:24:56 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1830U22Utl0qQN5tePZHfqhO+T1RXIWReNU09F oeE1CsoeLYnqIW5UJUkvbOyBcb9PKviRdKmJYM3FRatwic2sHJ soHrcvHgONMppkSsqq0Lg== Subject: Reproducible panic of 6.2 on double mount ntfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:24:57 -0000 Hello! With '/dev/ad0s1 /mnt/ad0s1 ntfs ro,noauto 0 0' in fstab, if I issue 'mount /mnt/ad0s1' twice, I always get a panic with the message: panic: lockmgr: locking against myself If I issue 'mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt/ad0s1' twice, there is no panic. I only get 'mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s1: Operation not permitted' as expected. For a different (non-ntfs) filesystem, using plain mount twice gives 'Operation not permitted', too. System is: FreeBSD janh.freebsd 6.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Apr 26 17:55:55 UTC 2007 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 Can anyone reproduce this? Just for my curiosity: What is mount doing differently than mount_ntfs? Thanks, Jan Henrik