From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 29 13:10:17 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2BA106566B;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:10:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org)
Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [194.255.56.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20898FC08;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:10:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 543A46D400; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:51:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:51:09 +0200
From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20110929125109.GF51724@heechee.tobez.org>
References: <20110929060800.GA37900@vniz.net> <20110929062949.GA48275@vniz.net>
	<20110929063053.GE60292@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
	<20110929064814.GA48462@vniz.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110929064814.GA48462@vniz.net>
X-Powered-By: FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.ORG, perl@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: One of p5-Net-SSLeay dependencies is missing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:10:17 -0000

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:48:14AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:30:53PM -0700, milki wrote:
> > Yes, because BSDPAN appears sooner in the perl module path, so it picks
> > up BSDPAN's EUMM first.
> 
> Then, should we just remove BSDPAN's EUMM automatically after its 
> installation? (in case we can't fix BSDPAN itself to not install EUMM)

No, we need to fix BSDPAN.  I've been meaning to look at it for a while now.

\Anton.
-- 
Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation.
  -- John McCarthy