From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 02:59:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344616A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 02:59:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFA743D58 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 02:59:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5N2xDco016220; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:59:14 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:59:29 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040622220538.34e5e5a5@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040622220538.34e5e5a5@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406221959.30056.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: cvsup and ports INDEX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 02:59:36 -0000 On Tuesday 22 June 2004 07:05 pm, epilogue@allstream.net wrote: > hello all, > > Connecting to cvsup.ca.FreeBSD.org > Connected to cvsup.ca.FreeBSD.org > Server software version: SNAP_16_1e > Negotiating file attribute support > Exchanging collection information > Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection > Running > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > Checkout ports/INDEX <<<<<<< how is this different > from... > > # portsdb -Uu <<<<<<< ...this? > > i'm not sure i have a firm grasp of why i do both. are they > complimentary or redundant steps? could someone please clarify or > point me to right set of docs? > > > hello ken, > > thought that you might be able to help because of your reply on > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2004-June/013223.htm >l The only port I refuse is ports/INDEX[-5] for just this reason. You are building a new INDEX with portsdb -U and then spending a lot of time downloading an old version the next time you cvsup. Kent > > thanks, > epi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html