From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 1 21:41:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B58816A417 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C9F13C48E for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590D3209D; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 22:41:00 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CD2209B; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 22:41:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B51184479; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 22:41:00 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Artem Kuchin" References: <0fbb01c81be1$37e698f0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:41:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0fbb01c81be1$37e698f0$0c00a8c0@Artem> (Artem Kuchin's message of "Wed\, 31 Oct 2007 20\:12\:28 +0300") Message-ID: <863avptzir.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIO_FLUSH on twe driver. Why is it not there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:41:46 -0000 "Artem Kuchin" writes: > However, twe is working via scsi subsystem and the authour of gjournal > said somewhere that he has had implemeneted BIO_FLISH for scsi and he > specifically mentioned that he has tested twe and twa and they both > support BIO_FLUSH. twa(4) uses CAM, but twe(4) doesn't (and never has). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no