From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 19:16:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8549A1065673; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (svn.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745488FC15; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9VJGsif001151; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:54 GMT (envelope-from uqs@svn.freebsd.org) Received: (from uqs@localhost) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o9VJGsmC001149; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:54 GMT (envelope-from uqs@svn.freebsd.org) Message-Id: <201010311916.o9VJGsmC001149@svn.freebsd.org> From: Ulrich Spoerlein Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:54 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-SVN-Group: head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: svn commit: r214604 - head/bin/rm X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:54 -0000 Author: uqs Date: Sun Oct 31 19:16:54 2010 New Revision: 214604 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214604 Log: Fix typo and grammar nit Submitted by: arundel MFC after: 7 days (or when the bikeshed has abated) Modified: head/bin/rm/rm.1 Modified: head/bin/rm/rm.1 ============================================================================== --- head/bin/rm/rm.1 Sun Oct 31 18:27:05 2010 (r214603) +++ head/bin/rm/rm.1 Sun Oct 31 19:16:54 2010 (r214604) @@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ command appeared in .Sh BUGS The .Fl P -option assumes that the underlying storage overwrites file block +option assumes that the underlying storage overwrites file blocks when data is written to an existing offset. Several factors including the file system and its backing store could defeat this assumption. This includes, but is not limited to file systems that use a Copy-On-Write strategy (e.g. ZFS or UFS when snapshots are being used), Flash -media that is using a wear leveling algorithm, or when the backing datastore +media that are using a wear leveling algorithm, or when the backing datastore does journaling, etc. In addition, only regular files are overwritten, other types of files are not.