From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 16:45:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587C106566C; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340B48FC08; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sa-nc-it-164.static.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p7TGjUeb018217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:45:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <4E5B4BFB.9040907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:45:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E580B14.7090208@FreeBSD.org> <1A828073-1D5F-4850-9379-4AB62CF3DAE3@xcllnt.net> <4E5B4BFB.9040907@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: FreeBSD-Current , Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: possible mountroot regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:45:37 -0000 On Aug 29, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 27/08/2011 18:16 Marcel Moolenaar said the following: >>=20 >> On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> It seems that after the introduction of the mountroot scripting = language a user >>> now has exactly one chance to try to specify a correct root device = at the >>> mountroot prompt. I am not sure that that is convenient/enough. >>=20 >> This is no different from before. >=20 > Are you sure? > I remember trying multiple (incorrect) possibilities at the prompt and = not > getting the panic. But I know that sometimes I have cases of "false = memories", > so _I_ am not sure. I'm sure now that we're both not sure :-) It's possible the failure mode varied by how the root mount failed... --=20 Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net