From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 10 22:52:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489EC1065672; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.221.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF948FC14; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so3770715qyk.13 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eKD7F2usQ7dJ6srnHt7HjXQyI+C3B99ctXSEYmFv4sI=; b=HUJmh99vCkMdo7vbguhvKGzyMZQ3Ba+llHij2DFdtCN+APIA2Cmyd0g0CeKj1qHG8h JtJ8cwoAOKGVSjx+grFtH2vLlKUfGB6pWZMp+rneD6j7ZI/t1FYLBy645SwfQ7HH56ng ZIzR406OBGGOOYIMStnXmTU1xlTp/rNAf6p+s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=r2Q+w36lKhpAg1uWGimephqi7eneIFcKEQh1X43h2QU3p0ZaSDCMAM68XlTMGKOFQv ErKBYQCnWjvgteE8XwmYFUK9cgoNnydalRDCA2kskiaMZSMS9f3I7adEod4bj3b4OCWn kVssLWeycdGO1TqeOnZrO0BL5XRVZrSLbWqhI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.28.85 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:48 -0700 Received: by 10.229.128.82 with SMTP id j18mr3105767qcs.61.1270939969012; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: arch@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: [RFC] Remove @owner and @user from package list X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:52:50 -0000 Hi again arch, When doing some research, it appears that while functionality in theory exists for @owner and @user in the package list, it isn't actually used in the pkg_install code at all, adding unnecessary bloat to package lists; FWIW this functionality (just like @exec and @unexec) can be implemented via pkg-install or more reliably via an mtree file. Thoughts? Thanks, -Garrett