Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:55:00 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: <danial_thom@yahoo.com>, "Sasa Stupar" <sasa@stupar.homelinux.net>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEBIFDAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051220183225.64479.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
actually, I tested the ping-flooder from the my-security.net link and surprisingly it works under W2K. At least, enough to be able to get the FreeBSD system it was targeted at to start instituting ICMP limiting. I have no idea if it could in fact actually saturate a 100BaseT connection, or in fact if any Win2K system could. The presumption was that if Sasa was indeed interesting in running it, we could move on to a bit more sophistication, such as packet-counting access lists on the FreeBSD router that he's publishing stats from. Once we get some numbers from that, we could begin doing some rudimentary math to see what we have. Unfortunately, though, looks like Sasa has lost interest in the project when it started to require some effort to do. :-( Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:32 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Sasa Stupar; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >Song) > > >LOL. Trying to dig ditches with ice cream sticks >boys? > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >wrote: > >> >> Sasa, >> >> Try this ping flooder then: >> >> >http://my-security.net/outofsite/ICMP%20Ping%20Flood.zip >> >> Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Sasa Stupar >> [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >> >Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 12:00 AM >> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? >> (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >> >Song) >> > >> > >> >It doesn't work on winxp. I am going to build >> another machine >> >with FreeBSD >> >5.4 and I'll try it then and let you know the >> results. >> > >> >Sasa >> > >> >--On 18. december 2005 14:02 -0800 Ted >> Mittelstaedt >> ><tedm@toybox.placo.com> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> In looking at this again, I didn't realize >> you were pinging from >> >> Win2K >> >> >> >> Win2K uses the -f option to set the Do Not >> Fragment bit, UNIX uses >> >> the -f option to flood ping. Win2k ping >> does not have a flood ping >> >> option. You can download a ping for Windows >> from Microsoft here: >> >> >> >> >> >http://research.microsoft.com/barc/mbone/mping.aspx >> >> >> >> that does have an option for flooding >> traffic. ( set the milliseconds >> >> between packets very low) but I have not >> tested it. Doubtless >> >> others are available on the Internet. >> >> >> >> Ted >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>> >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >> >>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 AM >> >>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps >> Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >> >>> Song) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of >> utilisation. >> >>> >> >>> Sasa >> >>> >> >>> --On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted >> Mittelstaedt >> >>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> what does the CPU of the router do when >> your doing that? >> >>>> >> >>>> Ted >> >>>> >> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>>> >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of >> >Sasa Stupar >> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM >> >>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps >> Connections? (Was Re: >> >Freebsd Theme >> >>>>> Song) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted >> Mittelstaedt >> >>>>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>>>>> From: >> owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>>>>> >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of >> >>> Sasa Stupar >> >>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >> >>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps >> Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >> >>>>>>> Theme Song) >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted >> Mittelstaedt >> >>>>>>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar >> [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 >> AM >> >>>>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; >> danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >> >>>>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps >> Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >> >>>>>>>>> Theme Song) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted >> Mittelstaedt >> >>>>>>>>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>>>>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar >> [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 >> 12:34 AM >> >>>>>>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; >> danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps >> Connections? (Was >> >Re: Freebsd >> >>>>>>>>>>> Theme Song) >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ted >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what >> I have done with and >> >>>>>>>>> without polling: >> >>>>>>>>>>> ************** >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>>>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, >> TCP port 5001 >> >>>>>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte >> (default) >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>>>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port >> 1088 connected with >> >>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer >> Bandwidth >> >>>>>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes >> 90.1 Mbits/sec >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> This is when I use Device polling >> option on m0n0. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> If I disable this option then my >> transfer is worse: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>>>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, >> TCP port 5001 >> >>>>>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte >> (default) >> >=== message truncated === > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.2/208 - Release Date: >12/20/2005 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEBIFDAA.tedm>