Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:32:04 +0100 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: Bernard Spil <brnrd@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org, ports-secteam@freebsd.org, dinoex@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Message-ID: <CAOhm=5pPvKeJV5VHkdnDj=5nE73mH=gv7Z=240bfG6AwKzKvOg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new security/openssl11 port? Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. Chris On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote: > ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to > ports@ where this belongs a lot more. > > +--On 22 ao=C3=BBt 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> w= rote: > | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL > | port to 1.1.0! > > All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not build > with it. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOhm=5pPvKeJV5VHkdnDj=5nE73mH=gv7Z=240bfG6AwKzKvOg>