From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 4 09:54:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABF61065672; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ipfw.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:6141::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36C38FC0C; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from v6.mpls.in ([2a02:978:2::5] helo=ws.su29.net) by mail.ipfw.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SmMKI-0006RD-E7; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:56:50 +0400 Message-ID: <4FF412B9.3000406@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:54:01 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120121 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <4FF319A2.6070905@FreeBSD.org> <4FF361CA.4000506@FreeBSD.org> <20120703214419.GC92445@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4FF36438.2030902@FreeBSD.org> <4FF3E2C4.7050701@FreeBSD.org> <4FF3FB14.8020006@FreeBSD.org> <4FF402D1.4000505@FreeBSD.org> <20120704091241.GA99164@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20120704091241.GA99164@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Doug Barton , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:54:05 -0000 On 04.07.2012 13:12, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Alex, > i am sure you are aware that in FreeBSD we have netmap too Yes, I'm aware of that :) > which is probably a lot more usable than packetshader > (hw independent, included in the OS, also works on linux...) I'm actually not talking about usability and comparison here :). Thay have nice idea and nice performance graphs. And packetshader is actually _platform_ with fast packet delivery being one (and the only open) part of platform. Their graphs shows 40MPPS (27G/64byte) CPU-only IPv4 packet forwarding on "two four-core Intel Nehalem CPUs (2.66GHz)" which illustrates software routing possibilities quite clearly. > > cheers > luigi >