From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jul 5 17:56:38 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA14165 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:56:38 -0700 Received: from uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au (uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au [130.102.192.8]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA14158 ; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:56:33 -0700 Received: from flute.cs.uq.oz.au by uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au id ; Thu, 6 Jul 95 10:55:56 +1000 Message-Id: <9507060055.AA21341@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> To: me@freebsd.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 1995 12:28:00 +0600." Date: Thu, 06 Jul 1995 10:55:54 +1000 From: Eddie Fung Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >... >hidden internal network using FreeBSD. In fact, we'll be using FreeBSD >exclusively for firewalls and general servers (http, ftp, etc.) for >our 1500 people company soon. > I am glad to hear that. In fact we are going the same direction in our department. We will be using two FreeBSD boxes for our firewall. However, we are still having problem with the x-gw of TIS fwtk-1.3. Do you have the same experience? TIS fwtk-1.3 runs very well on Linux but we still believe BSD is a better choice. The only trouble, - we have to make a tunnel to let X through. Regards Eddie | Eddie Fung | Department of Computer Science | | efung@cs.uq.edu.au | University of Queensland | | (617) 365 2425 | Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia |