Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 04:12:52 -0700 From: erk <tapeworm@insekta.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/42870: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a Message-ID: <20020918041252.17daf673.tapeworm@insekta.org> In-Reply-To: <20020917184537.GA22391@nomad.thehutt.org> References: <3D8775E9.4050409@mail.flyingcroc.net> <1032287836.331.66.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020917184537.GA22391@nomad.thehutt.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:45:37 -0400
Jerry A! <jerry@thehutt.org> wrote:
> Could you please give some thought as to how to name
> /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla before you make the repo copy? For instance,
> should it be a symlink to /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla-${ver} or what?
>
> The reason I ask is b/c ports like flashplugin-mozilla and plugger
> break if /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla doesn't exist.
>
> Thanks for all your hard work.
just to note, as a temporary workaround of sorts, if you rename
mozilla-devel to simply mozilla, make plugger and flashplugin-mozilla,
then change it back to mozilla-devel, it seems to have no adverse
effects. plugins run fine (or at least, no worse than normal), etc.
i'm all for a symlink idea, though, since workarounds like that tend to
make me a little nervous.
- erik
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020918041252.17daf673.tapeworm>