From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  2 16:50:47 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E4B1065676
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2008 16:50:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org)
Received: from mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be
	[195.238.6.175])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65AF8FC28
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2008 16:50:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org)
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswEAC71NElR9Tde/2dsb2JhbACBbdEMgn8
Received: from 94.55-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO
	kalimero.kotnet.org) ([81.245.55.94])
	by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2008 17:50:45 +0100
Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1])
	by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB2Gohf9003824;
	Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:50:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org)
From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>
To: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:50:42 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <20081130221935.GA79764@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20081130221935.GA79764@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Length: 2128
X-UID: 90
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200812021750.43465.tijl@ulyssis.org>
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>,
	Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: wine-1.1.8 regression -- wine: could not load L"...": Invalid
	address
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:50:47 -0000

On Sunday 30 November 2008 23:19:35 Alex Kozlov wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Alex Kozlov wrote:
>>>> The patch moves this to (address_space_limit - 10 * VIRTUAL_HEAP_SIZE).
>>>> I'm not sure that's correct. I think simply 0x80000000 would be better,
>>>> but that's what Alexandre can tell you.
>>> 
>>> I'm also not sure. That why this patch quick and dirty. Let see what 
>>> Julliard has to say.
> 
> From Alexandre POV most correct action will be to fix reserve_areas logic
> on FreeBSD. (I try that on this weekend, but with limited success. Very
> limited. Need more work, and I'm not sure that I will have enough time)

You tried porting the preloader?

> As for the patch, place when alloc virtual_heap don't matter. So I think
> 0x80000000 is ok.

On second thought, you'll probably need something like 0x81000000 or
even further, because the win9x shared heap is supposed to be at
0x80000000.

Will you submit a patch for this (perhaps as a follow-up to
ports/128926), then Daichi can commit it and we'll be settled for
the time being.