From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 12 12:26:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA06594 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 12 May 1998 12:26:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from versa.eng.comsat.com (versa.eng.comsat.com [134.133.169.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA06536 for ; Tue, 12 May 1998 12:26:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc@versa.eng.comsat.com) Received: (from marc@localhost) by versa.eng.comsat.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id WAA00413 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:40:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:27:39 -0500 (EST) Organization: Comsat Mobile Communications From: Marc Giannoni To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: CCITT -OR- X.25 networking Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi: Anybody use the "CCITT" X.25 networking facilities? (It's in "i386/conf/LINT") How about the "LLC" and the "HDLC" link layer? We have some X.25 based services and I'm wondering if FreeBSD is a better platform for this. There seem to be a variety of Sync/Async cards to support X.29 and X.21 so hardware does not seem to be a problem. I'm just curious about the amount of 'exercise' that the X.25 networking layer has received. Thanks Marc Giannoni To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message