Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:27:09 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 39df21b6f9be - main - devel/sdl20: mark two options BROKEN when disabled Message-ID: <YmavvUiHrMKDbCXA@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <b669e2d5-fb70-54e4-e1f0-af2ad9898310@freebsd.org> References: <202204201057.23KAv8s9028336@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <2d723c61-0194-4fe8-9b84-511d9d2f2b46@freebsd.org> <YmBlN%2BArCvasV1bO@hades.panopticon> <b669e2d5-fb70-54e4-e1f0-af2ad9898310@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Charlie Li (vishwin@freebsd.org) wrote: > >> On what architectures are these broken when disabled? I have JOYSTICK > >> disabled on amd64 and it had always built successfully. > > > > These are unlikely architecture dependent, but I'm testing on amd64 > > too. These are reproducible in poudirere, reprise and locally. Also > > the option is named SDL_JOYSTICK. > > > Ran a few more tests (in poudriere) with different OPTION combinations, > seems like only disabling SDL_EVENTS is broken with the specified error. > Not getting the linker error when disabling SDL_JOYSTICK however. I've looked at the code and it turned out that the failing part belonged to SDL_HAPTIC subsystem. You probably have it disabled as well, which is why you're not getting the failure. Should be fixed in eda6359. -- Dmitry Marakasov . amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: https://github.com/AMDmi3 https://amdmi3.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YmavvUiHrMKDbCXA>