From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 08:30:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FFC1065693; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hinokind@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00F78FC17; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1320009fxm.36 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:30:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:to:cc:subject :references:date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9MXhKVsuaDgtGq3Ma5HvFdUNv/Hce+bTgn0G9HGlrFQ=; b=i8GZylLJ3ustkxkhFQNXD7KTVnJoCKUZvz6BYh4cutg4q1QbeYH7G58Ky5YhQfeQlU fJ2d+HpNK+GH57IuJhdIObOIDv9mEW8iMd/pA3C60iB/5s0W8tusJ+nkeCrrDbxQVQYd WxhWRi3ix1b2sGsRZ1SOs0dBrT9L3tOY/DzxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=fbYXHtRPhN712aTAV02CKUTS6hVFoRPG2zV4vNPyaUwxvfFwi5yRFUEHgEudhJOh19 T9/aAsrn9xxRy9qVNFKULQb/+zzTYSxFn/r9pL6EAjo4J5GTT9sErCGQIZkO8yt+tLid 3fKZ47yj55tAhskIBI7zg2SRM/DSpCSmFkIww= Received: by 10.86.238.30 with SMTP id l30mr2760666fgh.75.1253781045661; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klevas (hst-17-80.splius.lt [77.79.17.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm1194290fgb.19.2009.09.24.01.30.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Andriy Gapon" References: <4ABA36B1.9070706@icyb.net.ua> <4ABB13EC.3020202@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:30:40 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcml1cyBNb3JrxatuYXM=?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4ABB13EC.3020202@icyb.net.ua> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.00 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, =?utf-8?Q?Dorian_B=C3=BCttner?= Subject: Re: sb600/sb700 ohci experimental patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:30:47 -0000 On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:38:36 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote= : > BTW, how many ports do you have at the back? > If more than 2, could you please try connecting the mouse to a port th= at is not > connected to uhub0 (this could be verified with usbconfig)? > And then see if you still get a mouse attachment problem during boot? > (No other devices during boot please :-) to simplify the testcase.) If I have USB Legacy disabled, mouse works in any port (with or without = your patch). When USB Legacy is enabled, without your patch mouse only works = if I unplug and plug it into a different port after boot. With your patch it = works in any port and doesn't care about USB legacy stuff. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:22:28 +0300, Dorian B=C3=BCttner wrote: > Also, it appears that you are using 1MB capable usb flash on front, 40= MB/s at > the rear port? That brings me to the idea, do you have legacy usb enab= led in > bios or not? Cause, when I disable, I get other head power values than= with > legacy enabled. I forgot to mention that my tests were done with USB legacy disabled. No= w I looked at the values with it enabled, but unlike in your case, the value= s are the same in both cases. -- = Andrius