Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:03:35 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/171084: [PATCH] shells/p5-Shell-Perl: update to 0.0022 Message-ID: <CADLo838o9B7yrHYJOZeQ-UzLnLf9NAMXWoit36BALW8mLfU%2BBA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <503A70A7.30903@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208261840.q7QIe2nV047178@freefall.freebsd.org> <503A6F41.7070205@FreeBSD.org> <503A6FF9.5000207@FreeBSD.org> <503A70A7.30903@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 August 2012 19:53, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 08/26/2012 11:50, Steve Wills wrote: >> On 08/26/12 14:47, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Steve, >>> >>> Why do we have this sudden flood of PRs? >>> >> >> I'm bored and I got a local portscout instance working, so it's easier >> for me to see what's out of date. > > Ok .... but is there a way for you to relieve your boredom without > punishing us? :) Especially if you're going to end up taking the PR > anyway? Not really-- he's getting maintainer approval from a PR. If you know of any way to send a perl PR without it going via perl, please tell! Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838o9B7yrHYJOZeQ-UzLnLf9NAMXWoit36BALW8mLfU%2BBA>