From owner-cvs-all  Thu Apr 18  8:32: 3 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 221F137B400; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B10341E0FB; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:31:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA29120;
	Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:31:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id IAA13002;
	Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200204181531.IAA13002@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: ru@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk is broken
Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
References:  <200204171349.g3HDnTV73622@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204171603420.26554-100000@smtp.gnf.org> <20020418080234.GF98788@sunbay.com> <200204181504.IAA12706@windsor.research.att.com> <20020418152540.GC79334@sunbay.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:31:52 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.4/makemail 2.9b
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>bsd.init.mk also includes ${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc.  If this
>is the right thing for bsd.port.mk-driven makefiles, please
>change that to bsd.init.mk.

Oops, I guess I threw the topic off.  What I was really talking about was
the location of the added .include (I thought share/mk/bsd.port.mk instead
of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk); by talking about bsd.init.mk I accidentally
refocused the discussion.

New, somewhat less incorrect proposal:  can the .include <bsd.own.mk>
go in share/mk/bsd.port.mk instead of ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk, to make
it OS version dependent?  ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk would have to have
lots of trickery around the .include <bsd.own.mk> to make things work
on 4.x too.

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message