Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:12:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, hackers@freebsd.org, davidxu@freebsd.org, Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: threaded, forked, rethreaded processes will deadlock Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0903181411540.29420@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20090318163222.GE7716@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4966F81C.3070406@elischer.org> <20090109163426.GC2825@green.homeunix.org> <49678BBC.8050306@elischer.org> <20090116211959.GA12007@green.homeunix.org> <49710BD6.7040705@FreeBSD.org> <20090120004135.GB12007@green.homeunix.org> <20090121230033.GC12007@green.homeunix.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0901211831210.4150@sea.ntplx.net> <20090122045637.GA61058@zim.MIT.EDU> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0901220021320.4150@sea.ntplx.net> <20090318163222.GE7716@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > I looked at the issue once more recently, and I propose the following > much less intrusive patch. It is somewhat hackish, but I think that > it would be good to have this working. Most other Unixes do have > working thread library after the fork. Any objections ? No objections. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0903181411540.29420>