From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:30:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE05516A409 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB5613C48C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3RKUBsB067865 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l3RKUBnJ067861; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:11 GMT Message-Id: <200704272030.l3RKUBnJ067861@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Scott Long Cc: Subject: Re: kern/112119: system hangs when starts k3b on RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scott Long List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/112119; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Scott Long To: Thomas Quinot Cc: Nikolay Pavlov , "Ganbold.TS" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, mjacob@FreeBSD.ORG, linimon@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/112119: system hangs when starts k3b on RELENG_6 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:28:14 -0600 Thomas Quinot wrote: > * Scott Long, 2007-04-27 : > >> Oh hell, I know exactly what the problem is! The opcode for a >> TEST_UNIT_READY is 0x00. This is probably the command that is >> generating the CHECK_CONDITION. The test for saved_cmd is entirely >> bogus. > > Hmmmm. Looks like a very plausible culprit. Good catch Scott! > (I felt there had to be something wrong when I wrote that test, > incidentally, precisely because of TEST_UNIT_READY). > > Nikolay, Ganbold, (and others), here's another patch against 1.42.2.3, > please let me know if it works for you. > > Thomas. > > Index: atapi-cam.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /space/mirror/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v > retrieving revision 1.50 > diff -u -r1.50 atapi-cam.c > --- atapi-cam.c 14 Mar 2007 01:59:00 -0000 1.50 > +++ atapi-cam.c 27 Apr 2007 19:26:09 -0000 > @@ -729,7 +743,7 @@ > * issued a REQUEST SENSE automatically and that operation > * returned without error. > */ > - if (request->u.atapi.saved_cmd != 0 && request->error == 0) { > + if (request->u.atapi.sense.key != 0 && request->error == 0) { > bcopy (&request->u.atapi.sense, &csio->sense_data, sizeof(struct atapi_sense)); > csio->ccb_h.status |= CAM_AUTOSNS_VALID; > } Right, just make sure that this isn't filled with garbage before you send the command. If you're using ata_alloc_request(), and you're not recycling requests internally, then you should be fine. Scott