From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 22 2:30: 0 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 02:29:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481BF37B400; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:29:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from roam@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBMATxc45696; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:29:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:29:59 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200012221029.eBMATxc45696@freefall.freebsd.org> To: roam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/23732: [PATCH] devel/cs has unfetchable distfile Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/cs has unfetchable distfile Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->obrien Responsible-Changed-By: roam Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Dec 22 02:26:37 PST 2000 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer. This patch has whitespace issues, too, but there's something more - a changed MD5 checksum. I diff'd the distfiles, and there's new functionality added, without a version bump (don't we all love those..) I wonder if this could be cause for an upped PORTVERSION - it seems PORTREVISION should not be used for such authors' slip-ups.. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=23732 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message