From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 20:33:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A4B16A41F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:33:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E498043D5A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9KKUhsa013565; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:30:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:32:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20051020.143205.38082947.imp@bsdimp.com> To: doug@polands.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <4356E65B.6060009@polands.org> References: <4356E65B.6060009@polands.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:30:44 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression in device ath between BETA5 and RC1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:33:22 -0000 In message: <4356E65B.6060009@polands.org> Doug Poland writes: : I'm running 6.0-RC1 on a laptop with a Netgear WG511T PCMCIA ethernet : adapter. Today I cvsup'd from BETA5 to RC1 and have noticed a serious : regression in performance of this card/driver. Has anyone else noticed : this? Should I submit a PR? Define serious regression in performance. I'm unaware of any problems in this area. Is there some way you can quantify which change between beta5 and rc-1 appears to have caused this? Warner