From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jul 26 17:47: 8 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from ekk.net (207-103-7-12-cpadsl.voicenet.com [207.103.7.12])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761FF37C072
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dag@dag.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ekk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9618630CBF; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ed Kern <dag@dag.net>
X-Sender: dag@207-103-7-12-cpadsl.voicenet.com
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: Michael L Artz <slyph@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: ipfw without nat-ing?
In-Reply-To: <200007261531.LAA00670@scrubbing-bubbles.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007262045290.384-100000@207-103-7-12-cpadsl.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Michael L Artz wrote:

> I don't want to use any sort of NAT because of its limitations 
> (games, realplayer, etc) 

For what it's worth, I use natd, ipfw, and 4.0-stable, and my realplayer
on the nat side of my lan works fine..

Cheers,

Ed.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message