From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  8 21:03:48 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFE31065672
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Dec 2011 21:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danno@internet2.edu)
Received: from int-proxy01.merit.edu (int-proxy01.merit.edu [207.75.116.230])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7277D8FC0A
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Dec 2011 21:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by int-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DDF10002D;
	Thu,  8 Dec 2011 16:03:48 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at int-proxy01.merit.edu
Received: from int-proxy01.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (int-proxy01.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id EtLMSRo0JPkO; Thu,  8 Dec 2011 16:03:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shrubbery.internet2.edu (eduroam-wlan-116.internet2.edu
	[198.108.5.116])
	by int-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 508ED10001F;
	Thu,  8 Dec 2011 16:03:47 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4EE12632.4070309@internet2.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:03:46 -0500
From: Dan Pritts <danno@internet2.edu>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.2 (Macintosh/20111203)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
References: <4EE118C7.8030803@internet2.edu>
	<CAOjFWZ4kZfepsBdb0O9s3sivj2+oSkXhX1P_uyrbJW--Cp0CxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ4kZfepsBdb0O9s3sivj2+oSkXhX1P_uyrbJW--Cp0CxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS hangs with 8.2-release
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:03:48 -0000

Upgrading is our intent...IF we stay with FreeBSD.  Thus my question 
about stability improvements in freebsd 9.

Which I guess you've answered; we'll give it a go.

thanks
danno
> Freddie Cash <mailto:fjwcash@gmail.com>
> December 8, 2011 3:29 PM
>
> With a pool that big, you really should upgrade to 8-STABLE or
> 9-STABLE. Both of those support ZFSv28. You don't need to upgrade
> the pool/filesystems to ZFSv28, but the new code is much more stable
> and speedy. Plus, there are a lot of nice extra features in ZFSv28
> compared to ZFSv15.
>

-- 
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224