From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 10 05:48:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712D339A; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 05:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48761151F; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 05:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2DF438BC; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:48:37 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <52A6AB25.9000203@marino.st> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:48:21 +0100 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: www/rt42: Fail Install References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: matthew@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 05:48:54 -0000 On 12/10/2013 05:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: > # make install > ===> Installing for rt42-4.2.1_1 > [snip] > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/rt42 > # It is inappropriate to send a large build log (and without any introductory text at that) to the freebsd-ports@ mail list. Sending it to the maintainer (CC'd) was ok, but opening a PR is actually the appropriate action to take. ( http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html ) Thanks, John P.S. Please don't say an email is easier to fire off than a opening a PR. Of course it is, but that doesn't make it any more appropriate.