From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Oct 21 22:48:15 1995
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id WAA25966
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:48:15 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA25961
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:48:09 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id PAA21331; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 15:43:15 +1000
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 15:43:15 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199510220543.PAA21331@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, steve2@genesis.nred.ma.us
Subject: Re: off_t (long long) problem
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>I was wondering if anyone had taken care of this problem since
>release 2.0.5. When I run the following test program under 2.0.5
>it prints '2'.

>The problem only seems to occur when the off_t is referenced through
>a pointer.

>Thanks,
>Steve
>steve2@genesis.tiac.net
>----- snip snip snip -----
>#include <stdio.h>

>struct foo {
>	off_t	o;
>} x;

>main()
>{
>	struct foo *f = &x;

>	f->o = 0;
>	f->o += 1;
>	printf("o = %qd\n", f->o);
>	exit(0);
>}
>----- EOF EOF EOF ----

This seems to be fixed in gcc-2.7.0.  There seems to be no problem if -O
is used.

Bruce