From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 21:57:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7B116A468 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB99213C457; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <473B6F46.2070509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:57:26 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <200711141539.47515.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:57:25 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: >> my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its >> items it updated: >> >> [root@canopus ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- >> cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System >> >> but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: >> >> ===> cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: >> => cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. >> Reference: >> > c.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build >> it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security >> settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. >> >> thanks, > > another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: > > Affects: > cups-base <1.3.3_1 > > but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris