Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:57:30 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/djvulibre Makefile ports/textproc/wordnet Makefile Message-ID: <1121443050.92732.41.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <200507151751.30130.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200507132352.j6DNqtUS011697@repoman.freebsd.org> <200507151635.10756.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050715172610.9n4mfl8oxogsk8w4@netchild.homeip.net> <200507151751.30130.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-xC1OVItfqovVs9kK67sp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Nottebrock p=ED=B9e v p=E1 15. 07. 2005 v 17:51 +0200: > On Friday, 15. July 2005 17:26, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Michael Nottebrock <lofi@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > >> Oh? Cluster does compile new package when PKGNAME changes. > > > > > > Does it really now? That's broken. The right thing would be to track = file > > > modifications timestamps ... > > > > Not every change makes it necessary to rebuild the package, e.g. a chan= ge > > to MASTER_SITE does not have to result in a rebuild of the package (if = the > > package isn't there because it wasn't fetchable before, the cluster DTR= T). >=20 > It would be better to err on the safe side there instead of having to bum= p=20 > PORTREVISION for the cluster's sake. After all, the cluster doesn't mind = a=20 > few gratuitous rebuilds too much - ports users do, especially those with=20 > slower machines. These PORTREVISION bumps are here mainly for the users. Because, when a library raises it's major version number, you need to relink all C binaries linked against the old copy of the library... PORTREVISION bumps together with common usage of portupgrade helps this very nicely. --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> > Why do we need a film of "Lord of the Rings" when we have the book? Because watching a cg enhanced Legolas fire a flaming arrow into the heart of a warg is cool? - asdf@asdf.com in rec.games.roguelike.angband --=-xC1OVItfqovVs9kK67sp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC19zqntdYP8FOsoIRAqKnAJ0SpGIkVKGPRkRMzIIfbbnTr2tr+gCeOydD JGddT1ZW+UE2MHQU5L+JOOM= =x2hZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xC1OVItfqovVs9kK67sp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1121443050.92732.41.camel>