From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 3 16:14:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2313437B419 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:14:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA04504; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:33:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:14:32 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Hovey To: Matthew Graybosch Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Billy-boy's at it again! In-Reply-To: <20020103190038.17e57d9c.matthew@starbreaker.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Stephen Hovey wrote: > > > Whats interesting is that linux is only a problem for MS due to its > > widespread use - the best OS Ive ever run has been freebsd - simply > > because of its robustnest, and how much abuse it can take with good > > response! > > I prefer FreeBSD over Linux too; everything makes more sense. Under Linux, > the build environment might have been sane, but that was it. >^..^< We used SCO and because it was horribly crashy and all I had heard of at the time was linux - I tried linux - it was better but not much - then I heard about freebsd and freaked at how long a machine would stay up and stabile and how much more of a workload it could handle, and still stay up and stable. Its an amazing piece of work. Truly amazing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message