From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 02:34:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C9A15B83FE; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579666C537; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j6so187603ioa.5; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2oSDMbuiBkXav7dxnVr1He46FEGjYk87ewaYNdzkrMI=; b=HUaYBDbHHvRKS2lF/Fb1KwwGRhue4qytsZOhFO7gKpXIAXHsIgrW0M49eZ+LNEtgDT b4Y9rkHg8djvUIvWKFdt49mRat7aVGro8mVudSGPXlO2a5eL7mb16NqTUpHse/ZbwXRg AogHwWj4ET9QOTwISUdxvdfcnf/aEmkynnbVKf2FgAoAyEixuH6U+yBcOw+uiwvSMbXl f85mty9MZFTWWDQWNuXWIPdW8T+/XmQyIGw34ZPpuygF4Fy9l2+7+5lww1m1Mp5RH3A+ PhFOmlUPzRt1eVcxIyHQn6yRIHgCrvhfmcrLItCqnZB7nm5YdQw6hEHrzNHZbWK1L84Z 4N7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2+zqA6RKtaB1/Z14cbMUEkAhNURJfhII0ejqxw+JIDoSED1Qa VDZa9c667gqfxpnZR6b6OYYZor4A X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTrzhNA2GmCdLz42V8IvywjxwZvS4zUTGuQTfUxuvspnPW8zgYxEfAPOzi86z8cZPZqXck+w== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b987:: with SMTP id j129mr65203608iof.166.1561430050062; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com. [209.85.166.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm10763305iom.42.2019.06.24.19.34.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id e3so1666273ioc.12; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9749:: with SMTP id c9mr21187162ioo.258.1561430049296; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> From: Ultima Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:33:58 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? To: Mel Pilgrim Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 579666C537 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ultima1252@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ultima1252@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; IP_SCORE(-2.54)[ip: (-6.87), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.44), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ultimasbox.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.958,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[45.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ultima@ultimasbox.com,ultima1252@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ultima@ultimasbox.com,ultima1252@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:34:18 -0000 Hello Mel, While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the move it likely won't happen for at least another decade at the minimum. Best regards, Richard Gallamore On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:50 PM Mel Pilgrim wrote: > I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of > it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the > lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support. > > Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and > NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations > over the inertia of embedded systems designers, has it really become > this easy to turn up an IPv6-only site? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >