From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 13:21:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149711065672 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAF88FC23 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA03059; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:05:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E9D797E.6000703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:05:02 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <20111001102327.GA37434@icarus.home.lan> <20111018071941.GA9482@icarus.home.lan> <087BDDD7-0B16-4415-8D98-11FA617E03F5@gsoft.com.au> <20111018113302.GA14363@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111018113302.GA14363@icarus.home.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Interpreting MCA error output X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:21:29 -0000 on 18/10/2011 14:33 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > Why? Most MCEs on FreeBSD will panic the machine. Incorrect. Correctable MCEs should not panic a machine. Uncorrectable should. > I would need to go > through the MCA code to see what all gets handled elegantly, Please do. > but I > imagine there isn't much. Please defer your imagination. > Also, isn't devd for device removal/insertions? Not only. It might have started like that, but now it is almost a generic mechanism for kernel to userland notifications (e.g. ACPI events). > This would be using > devd for something it isn't intended for. I guess I have "moral > objections" to it. What you're really wanting is Solaris's fmd(1m) > daemon, which I believe is also tied heavily into Solaris's smf(5) > architecture. > > http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19963-01/html/821-1462/fmd-1m.html -- Andriy Gapon