From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 16:17:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E752106566C; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@nitro.dk) Received: from emx.nitro.dk (emx.nitro.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:7384::102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1396A8FC17; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailscan.leto.nitro.dk (mailscan.leto.nitro.dk [127.0.1.4]) by emx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2838D11BEFE; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emx.nitro.dk ([127.0.1.2]) by mailscan.leto.nitro.dk (mailscan.leto.nitro.dk [127.0.1.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wzfqtJ5Rs9Tn; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.21] (unknown [188.141.45.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by emx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F315011BEF0; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <20111008120446.GU26743@acme.spoerlein.net> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 17:16:59 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4084CDBA-C96D-4D3E-9F99-9F64C68B187D@nitro.dk> References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <12F4B555-D14F-492C-9AC7-669BA33A0AF6@nitro.dk> <20111008120446.GU26743@acme.spoerlein.net> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:17:06 -0000 On 8 Oct 2011, at 13:04, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 11:20:53 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: >>=20 >> On 7 Oct 2011, at 15:13, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein wrote: >>=20 >>> What I, personally, would like to see is us using the same svn repo = as >>> src. That means we would have to stop svn.freebsd.org for the >>> conversion, turn off email sending, dump 50k revisions into it = (under >>> /doc and /www perhaps? where should branches/tags end up?), then = turn >>> everything back on. >>=20 >> The advantages of having one repo need to be significant as the >> disadvantages are certainly there. For svn to perform in the current >> setup all of the repo basically need to fit into RAM - one large repo >> makes this harder as we can't split on multiple servers as needed >> later. >=20 > I doubt that the 650MB of doc/www repo will make a difference here. OK, it's smaller than I recalled - so that part less not an issue for = main servers. >> Also, please think of ports - I really doubt src and ports will fit >> into same repo nicely... >=20 > As I stated earlier, I'm not advocating moving ports into the same = repo. > I'm not that crazy ... My main point was that if ports is still separate, I don't think we gain = much by merging src and doc. >> I'm not really sure where you would fit doc into the current repo... >> head/ etc. is on the top level. >=20 > /doc and /www would be the obvious choices. Ed even jokingly (??) said Well, that seems like a bit of a mess as you mainly have branches at = that level... > we should just rename /head to /src ... not sure I concur. Considering we have stable etc. on the same level that seems like a bad = thing to do... Regardless, if it should be one repo (I'm still not convinced at all it = buys us anything useful) Peter need to sign off on it and say it's the = right way to go - at least for me to touch it. --=20 Simon L. B. Nielsen