From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 27 15:29:40 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC2537B401; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7637443FE0; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:29:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1RNTV8Y088947; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:29:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h1RNTV0j088946; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:29:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:29:31 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Doug Barton Cc: Mike Barcroft , current@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20030227232931.GA84770@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Barton , Mike Barcroft , current@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200302272151.h1RLpIWv018756@sparc64.style9.org> <20030227142404.L8428@znfgre.tberna.bet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030227142404.L8428@znfgre.tberna.bet> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Doug Barton : > I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists > for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and > those not interested would not need to filter them out. > > Is anyone else interested in doing it that way? Or is this a solution > looking for a problem? I think most people who track -CURRENT are subscribed to current@ precisely because they want to know when things break. Similarly for -STABLE, but that's a moot point because -STABLE doesn't break very often. For people who don't agree with this, there's always procmail; the reports aren't all that frequent that filtering is some sort of burden. I do, however, like the idea of consolidating them and providing more concise summaries. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message