From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 12:44:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE27837B401 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226FD43F75 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:44:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19flya-0008T2-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:42:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19flxf-0008P4-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:41:11 +0200 From: othermark Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <3F2000A1.9060500@401.cx> <1059078101.687.0.camel@vaio.microbsd.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Etherbet interface redundancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:44:34 -0000 In article <1059078101.687.0.camel@vaio.microbsd.net>, Kerberus wrote: > Does the new version of FreeVRRPD do nic redundency in case of failure, > along with system failover ? As far as I know, FreeVRRPD only provides HOST to HOST failover. --- Mark atkin901 at NOSPAM yahoo dot com (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired);