From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 11 20:07:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA13138 for current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 20:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA13128; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 20:07:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611120407.UAA13128@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dyson@FreeBSD.org cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ufs is too slow? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Nov 1996 22:53:50 EST." <199611120353.WAA03769@dyson.iquest.net> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 20:07:07 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >The LFS that we have had in our tree never really worked correctly, >and wasn't very robust. However, it doesn't excuse me missing my target >for getting it fixed. I did ask Margo for help with her latest sources, >but got no response, other than an initial ack. Given that, I intend to >fully integrate it with our merged VM/Buffer cache, hopefully making progress >like getting rid of locked buffers, etc... > >John Yes, please get rid of the locked buffer stuff. That code is EVIL. BTW,do you have any plans for removing the 64k I/O limitation? It sorta sucks when you want to write a 1meg segment to have to cut it up into such small pieces. -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================