From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Jul 2 13:11:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA23291 for mobile-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 13:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA23285 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 13:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA28010; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 14:10:59 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 14:10:59 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199707022010.OAA28010@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "David E. Tweten" Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 on NEC 6030X -- Minor Problems In-Reply-To: <199707021949.MAA01124@ns.frihet.com> References: <199707021949.MAA01124@ns.frihet.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >[ Suspend doesn't work after configuring X ] > >If you don't startup X does it work now? > > No. Hmmm. Will have to investigate all the things I built out of the ports > collection from the time X was done until I noticed the suspend problem. Building a port shouldn't affect it at all, unless it's actually running. Most of the ports you listed were programs that X programs, so they shouldn't affect anything if X isn't even started. Something else is fishy here. Does is suspend under '95? Nate