From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jun 7 8:22: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC62B37B95F for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:21:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA08978; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:20:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000607091917.04a7d840@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 09:20:45 -0600 To: Rahul Siddharthan , "G. Adam Stanislav" From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Anti-BSD FUD Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000607201827.A2465@physics.iisc.ernet.in> References: <3.0.6.32.20000607093152.008b4910@mail85.pair.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20000606184736.04b0f2f0@localhost> <3.0.6.32.20000607093152.008b4910@mail85.pair.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:48 AM 6/7/2000, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >Quite. He was quite clearly talking about the license and not to the >software, so to open by attacking the article as "anti-BSD FUD" will >not really encourage people to read your response further. It *is* anti-BSD FUD. Note the headline -- "Fatal Flaw in BSD?" -- as well as the many assertions that BSD's licensing (and, by extension, BSD itself) is naive. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message