From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 02:36:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA406106566C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 02:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp03.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F998FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 02:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2011 22:36:30 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id BCU55379; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:36:30 -0400 Received: from 209-6-61-133.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([209.6.61.133]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2011 22:36:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4DEAEBAD.2040107@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:36:29 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110525 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <20110603001251.GA66356@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110603065653.GB65291@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4DE8D764.20607@gmx.de> <4DEA8A0E.5070108@aldan.algebra.com> <4DEAB13F.5060809@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DEAB13F.5060809@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Warren Block , Matthias Andree , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 02:36:31 -0000 On 04.06.2011 18:27, Doug Barton wrote: > The math on this is simple, there are maintainers willing to do the > work, or not. It does not matter, whether there are any such maintainers, /if there is no work to do/. Neither lang/gpc nor databases/db2 (for one more example) required a maintainer at all, when they got "pre-emptively" killed... > Rehashing the arguments about how nice it would be to keep every port > in the universe isn't going to get us anywhere. Every port in the universe (interestingly, all of them happened to be in the Solar system), /that continues to build through changes in the base OS/. That's quite achievable -- in fact, we had just that until fairly recently... -mi